Why SG appealing against Karpal Singh's sedition case

Karpal Singh, DAP chairperson, Khalsa warrior, learned counsel was indicted of mutiny opposite the Perak Sultan in the Perak inherent imbroglio, that in reality had stirred former Judge NH Chan to criticism that HRHs action in dismissing the States former MB, Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin, from his post was the uncover of pretend-power.

Malaysiakini reported that Karpal stated: authorised action could be instituted opposite the Perak sultan over his role in the state inherent crisis

In the mutiny box opposite Karpal, Judge Azman Abdullah discharged the charges, stating that what Karpal stated was kosher as Section 3(2)(a) of the Sedition Act 1948 provided for an exception, in that any Ruler could be told that he has been misled or mistaken.

What more, the decider pronounced the charge had failed to infer Karpal disregarded territory 3(1) of the Act, namely to stimulate hatred as well as unfaithfulness opposite the Ruler. He judged that Karpal had been really clinical, as well as though malice, in his statement that HRH was in error in inherent matters.

The judgement spelled it out clearly, unmistakenly as well as in accordance with the law no disregard had been directed during HRH, as clear by the sustenance of Section 3(2)(a) of the Sedition Act 1948.

No disregard equates to no factious action had been committed. HRHs honour had not been tainted, well ... during slightest legally.

So because is the Solicitor General delectable opposite the Judges decision? Why rubbish taxpayers money to follow something that was not present in the initial place? Why defend an honour that had not been besmirched?

There have been most accusations, chief among that has the renouned notion that the authority will get Karpal in the favourite sport ground, the padang pemati (killing field) so to speak, namely, the Court of Appeals.
!
But kaytee believes otherwise. Just speculating of course, though has it to do with Anwar Ibrahims box (Sodomy Mk II) where Karpal is Anwars lawyer?

As it's World Cup season, might I make use of the football terminology of the fortifying teams tactic when the formidable striker of the opposite group has the ball? I suspect it's the box of kacau dia kacau dia to confuse Anwar Ibrahim's heading striker?

Of march all during taxpayers expense, though afterwards what is this when it's nowhere near the price of the 'jolly' during Disney World, let alone those RM800 million x 2 projects.