Ishak Ismail replied?

My posting upon Kenmark yesterday here received the commentator claiming to be "Dato Ishak Ismail".

The presumed Ishak is one of the major shareholder of the uneasy company, Kenmark. He was the corporate player seldom heard in the news behind in the 90s, particularly during Anwar Ibrahim's stinct as Minister of Finance as well as associated with such entities as Idris, Aokam Perdana, KFC, etc.

The comment to scold mistake is most appreciated. But surely, it would have been some-more appropriate to be grave than addressing yours indeed as "bro" because you do not have any casual relationship.

In the suggestion of fairness, we respectfully reproduced his comment in full to give prominence to his reply below:

Dear Bro.

I read your articles as well as you need to have the little correction.

You said we sold the Kenmark shares prior to EON bank sign the factory. This is not true. The shares was bought by my family trustee after EON bank have sign the factory.

Bro, You additionally accuse me of being Anwar financier as well as crony in the 90. This is really critical allegation. Yes we was close to Anwar in the 90 because i was allocated by him to be Permatang Pauh UMNO multiplication secretary. Am we his crony. The answer is NO. Remember when Tun Mahathis revealed all the Anwar cronies, my name was not there.

My initial corporate move in the 90 by appropriation the shares of Idris Hydrulic was with the assistance of Tun Daim. The income was since to me by Tan Sri Tajuddin.

Bro, as the Muslim we can swear which we never give any income to PKR or Anwar to account his domestic onslaught as well as we am still an UMNO member in Permatang Pauh.

salamThe comment has no material significance to the issue of SC "harassment" upon monetary journalist to force them to do the unethical as well as unprofessional rehears! e of rev ealing their source of information, but it will be taken in great faith.

And it is to apply oneself his right to reply.
See What Pakatan Rakyat Gotta Say?